Company Tax Disclosures & New Tax Transparency Requirements
This year, a storm of new companies taxTaxes are mandatory payments or charges that local, state, and national governments collect from individuals or businesses to pay for general government services, goods, and services. disclosure is coming – a response to increased transparency requirements from US accounting standards, the European Union, and Australia. The new rules require companies to provide information that can be easily interpreted, because the information will be negative and not suitable for making strong decisions.
The European Union Same to you Australia they are more than a secret system establish by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in the last ten years, it has required the major countries to publish parts of their revenue, profit, tax, and census. In addition, companies that provide financial accounts following generally accepted accounting principles must disclose certain tax information as required. recent changes from the Financial Services Commission.
The data provides new information, but this information comes with challenges of standardization in the source, questions of scope for policy discussions, and obvious flaws in the reporting requirements.
Because this information can be used to promote unknown policies or attack business activities (or government policies) that are not related to tax planning or evasion, it is important to approach the information with caution. Low taxes reported in a particular area can be interpreted as avoidance when the reality is that investment activities or cyclical losses influence the numbers. The company can also adjust the previous audit within a year or is eligible for a tax returnA tax refund is a refund to taxpayers who have paid too much tax, often because employers withheld too much from them. The U.S. Treasury estimates that nearly three-quarters of taxpayers are over-withheld, resulting in millions in tax refunds. A high tax rate can be viewed as an interest-free loan to the government. On the other hand, about one fifth of taxpayers u according to the laws of a particular region. These data will not appear in the data, but they will influence the data.
Unfortunately, this information can lead to public debate about international taxation, although the information below is not suitable for this purpose. As the data comes out, there are three questions that politicians and the public should be asking.
What Does the Data Source Say About Its Benefits?
There are two ways to take this question. First, for all the things explained, the “basis” is some combination of accounting techniques, including interest, income taxes paid, deferred taxes, and other things. These data points are frequently reported in aggregate form by companies when they prepare their financial statements for shareholders or the public.
However, the profits shown in the financial statements are different from the taxable profits. Taxable income, as defined in the tax laws of countries around the world, is not included in this information. Cash (also known as “book”) income is different from income that is taxed in many ways, partly because investments and common business activities are subject to different rules and regulations. For example, a company can benefit from complete shutdownDeductibles allow businesses to deduct the full cost of certain investments in new or improved technology, equipment, or buildings. It reduces bias in the tax code and encourages companies to invest more, which, in the long run, boosts labor productivity, raises wages, and creates more jobs. in the national tax code while accounting rules require a straight line demoteDepreciation is a measure of the “useful life” of a business asset, such as machinery or plant, to determine the number of years over which the cost of that asset can be deducted from taxable income. Instead of allowing businesses to withdraw investment funds immediately (i.e. full spending), devaluation requires withdrawals over time, reducing their value and disco..
The purpose of financial statements is to inform shareholders based on accounting principles. Tax codes, on the other hand, are meant to adjust to features of the tax code written by lawmakers that have different concerns than shareholders, such as tax revenues and deductions, management and payment rates, and economic incentives.
Therefore, the source limits the usefulness of the data for policy analysis.
Second, it is important to identify the disclosure process. Is the information you are analyzing based on the new requirements in US GAAP? Is it being reported because of EU or Australian laws?
Each reporting standard has its own regulatory framework. In the next post, I will dig into these differences in more detail. These differences mean that the same company may be required to report different revenues, profits, and taxes under each standard. Such results will not be evidence that the company is trying to deceive the tax authorities. The rules of disclosure themselves will create this confusion.
If one examines the numbers produced under EU and Australian public international law, one can find different answers to what appears to be the same question. For example, the same company reporting under two standards may report two different revenue numbers in the same region because the requirements of the EU and Australia are different. The EU position will tend to result in higher reported revenues where related transactions are significant.
Essentially, a company with multiple subsidiaries in the jurisdiction that provides goods and services within the subsidiaries must record these intracompany revenues in total income, even though revenues from other subsidiaries are the source of profits. This can happen at the distribution center where the products move from the company’s production area to the organizations that want to take the products to market.
The question of the source in the end means that the calculation of statistics such as the effective tax rate will be misleading because the information in the data is not built on the information of the tax policy, and the rules of disclosure of the information are decided incorrectly and trying to draw conclusions from the disclosure of many disclosures.
How Will Tax Authorities Use This Information?
As mentioned above, the country-by-country reporting has been a part of the tax system for almost a decade. Large multinationals must comply with laws in the United States and elsewhere to disclose information to tax authorities on income, profits, employees, assets, and cash and taxes collected.
The information is reported to individual companies on a confidential basis. This confidentiality is based on the OECD agreements that set the standards. The new EU and Australian legislation is a clear departure from that agreement.
Tax authorities are able to use this information to assess risk in their taxpayer population and determine whether enforcement actions can be taken appropriately. For example, the government may discover a mismatch between profits and assets or employees that may lead to further scrutiny of the company’s tax practices.
The answer to the question, then, is that the tax authorities already have this information available to them and can use it as an additional tool for their implementation.
This raises the question of the value of disclosing this information to the public. It clearly does not expand the enforcement tools available to tax authorities.
Activists have justified the new information on the grounds that investors expect more disclosure or that public accountability is necessary. But because of the source and interpretation challenges associated with the data, the report may create more confusion than increase public understanding of companies and their global footprint.
What Does the Data Show About Tax Policy?
As discussed above, the basis of financial information means that there is no direct link between the information disclosed and the tax policy. Taxable profits are completely absent from the data. However, there are two tax concepts that many can rely on to make decisions about tax policy.
The first is the income tax paid. This is the only amount of tax that the company pays in a year. But this alone is not certain. The payment may be directly related to the taxable profit in the current year, which is increased by the payment in previous tax years due to adjustment. lookA tax audit is when the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or another agency or local revenue agency conducts a routine audit of financial statements to ensure an individual or company has correctly reported and paid their taxes. The choice may be at random, or because of the usual deductions or income reported on the tax return., or reduced by refund of taxes already paid.
The second tax is fine. This is a tax liability that the company expects to be paid in taxes over time. It is possible that the actual cash tax payment will be higher or lower than the accrued tax. The tax collected does not say anything about the speed of payment of this amount of tax.
Both cash flow and accrued taxes can be affected by timing issues. As mentioned, the income tax can be effective for one year when the assessment of the previous years is completed, or the refund is due to the taxpayer. The same is true for taxes collected. If the company has a deferred tax liability due to provisions in the tax code (like a full turn off), the tax collected now will be lower.
So one year’s tax information should not be used to make strong decisions about a company’s tax information.
Taken together, these limitations mean the data cannot reliably indicate whether a company is paying “too much” or “too little” tax based on any relevant criteria.
Conclusion
The new data will attract more attention in 2026 and beyond. However, because the information is rooted in accounting concepts, time-related factors, and organized by inconsistent reporting systems, it is not suitable for making strong decisions about tax policies or company behavior.
Therefore, analysts, journalists, and policy makers should approach the data carefully and focus on the questions outlined above to avoid misinterpretation.
Treatment: This is the first of a three-part series of tax reform measures that lead to new information in 2026. The Tax Foundation will host a webinar on this topic with other experts in the future; if you are interested in participating, please check back soon.
Tax makes sense with us in your inbox.
Subscribe to our newsletter for tax insights that cut through the noise—and make sense.
Share this article
